Expanding Earth theory (Growing Earth theory)

Expanding Earth theory (Growing Earth theory) and an Exchanging Earth with the rest of the solar system and universe?

The Expanding Earth theory is an interesting idea especially with the stunning visual ‘evidence’ – The Earths continents also appear to fit perfectly together on a smaller planet, to form a ‘supercontinent’ that would be the Earths surface.

Pangea seperationintro thumb

Geology theory suggests that many times in the past the Earths continents have broken up, drifted, then collided back together to form a one large landmass. Each time forming or breaking up a supercontinent.

Wikipedia: In geology, a supercontinent is the assembly of most or all of the Earth’s continental blocks or cratons to form a single large landmass … Supercontinents have assembled and dispersed multiple times in the geologic past.

Supercontinent names: Ur (Vaalbara), Kenorland, Protopangea-Paleopangea, Columbia (Nuna), Rodinia, Pannotia, Pangaea.

Could the planet have expanded, shrunk, expanded, shrunk … a few times to explain multiple supercontinents?

Ocean floor rock is new, thin and different

expanding earth theory growingThe sea floor rock material is different to continental rock, it is also relatively very new and thin. Is sea floor spreading at the mid ocean ridges new material as the Earth grows or expands?

is the earth planet still growing expanding

Oceanic crust underlies most of the two-thirds of the Earth’s surface which is covered by the oceans. It has a remarkably uniform composition (mostly 49% ± 2% SiO2) and thickness (mostly 7 ± 1 km).

The ocean floor is the most dynamic part of the Earth’s surface. As a result, no part of the oceanic crust existing today is more than 200 million years old, which is less than 5% of the age of the Earth itself.
British Antarctic Survey – Oceanic Crust

Growing Earth Theory (Expanding Earth Theory)

The Growing Earth or Expanding Earth theory suggests that instead of the supercontinents theory, the planet has expanded from its original supercontinent that was the whole Earths surface.

Over the centuries there have been a lot of theories about a hollow earth and an expanding Earth and how or what processes could cause a planet to grow. The video below is by Neal Adams who reignited the expanding Earth debate.

Neil Adams has his own unique ideas about the mechanics of how the planet could have grown. They are not necessarily what others who are interested in exploring the idea of the possibility of the planets having expanded at some time in the past.

Exchanging Earth

expanding earth energy puzzle space tornadoesBut how or what would trigger, cause, energise an Expanding Earth? What processes or mechanism could help with a Growing Earth?

Could the energy and perhaps if extra mass is needed, come from what seems to be planet Earth receiving and exchanging energy and molecules/matter with our Sun and perhaps in a circuit with our solar system?

With the other solar system bodies such as planets, moons, active asteroids and comets part of a plasma circuit and solar system engine?

Click for the Exchanging Earth introduction or for a list of all the XEarth articles (blog).

Be Sociable, Share!
24 comments
IndianOutlaw
IndianOutlaw

Every year the earth is bombarded with tons of pounds of mass in the form of meteors this adds mass. its like when you keep eating Doritos while you tell everyone they are wrong on the internet. you are expanding. wow. Its actually logical when you think of it.

electrobleme
electrobleme

meteors are a good mechanism for any planet to gain mass and get thicker.

no theory is right or wrong, personally i would say its fun (essential?) to at least test any theory or religion with thought experiments. could the planet itself (mantles, surfaces) be expanding or growing bigger internally?

theoretically what else could mid ocean ridges that produce sea floor spreading and new rock mean? what other mechanism could make some large land areas rise rapidly?

i think i have read that the planet earth has a molten metal core because it was an isolated body in space and had to produce its own magnetic field. as flux transfer events, spacequakes and other space plasma things seem to show the planet is not isolated but has current flowing through it in a solar circuit. what could that imply?

not just for the origin of the earths magnetosphere but for planet formation and everything based on it?

Snakelady
Snakelady

ofcourse it's growing the Jurassic period is miles beneath us.

terry
terry

If the universe has alway's existed, wouldn't it be one vast perpetual motion machine? Not a very credible position Mack71

Mack71
Mack71

@terry and yet its here always has been always will be it does not need your permission to exist it just does it is god and to try and understand god well no buddha no bible can do this it cant be done we can gain greater understanding but no where near total understanding.

As far as time is concerned weve all been here for a blink of an eye and trying to prove wheter the universe is timeless or not, haha well the lofty ideas of man.


as for credible position yes it was and is credible thats why i decided to accepted it and then i move on i do not require it to be credible to any judge or courts lol this was my sentient choice as you and others are i hope free to have your choice.

And somewhere along the line its perpetual motion what ever system, it once boomed into existance to where we are now going faster (so they say redshift or something) out n out i guess untill it dissipates into nothing if indeed its going faster, so iguess it goes boom again unless were led to believe that this is the only universe ever (oops "ever" that perpetual motion thing again) so time what is time did it start? does it exist sure we gave it seconds hours days, labels as such but actual time did we invent it just to try and understand the movement of things and life and death?


Is time? or is there no past no future the Universe is NOW and just is....

Mack71
Mack71

Expanding Universe! expanding into what exactly? sorry dont buy it. Universe is the universe always there everywhere always has been always will be, well thats one of my conclusions i decided to cement in place anyway until i find evedence to the contrary any how.

rodneykawecki
rodneykawecki

iUniverse Growing Earth Theory (Expanding Earth Theory)


The Growing Earth or Expanding Earth theory suggests that instead of the supercontinents theory, the planet has expanded from its original supercontinent that was the whole Earths surface.


Changes in gravity without change in Earths mass (gravity as an electromagnetic force, as science does not know what gravity actually is, they just know what they call gravity does)


It is my great question that ask " If the iuniverse is expanding " does this mean that all matter and celestial spheres galactic alike physically getting bigger and bigger without possibility of notice"? In the bible god talks about the giant = are we growing like giants a long with the planets and stars in the universe as the iuniverse expands? 


We look at the universe as a Hawkings bubble but Hubble Expanding we observe ourselves on a planets in a galaxy full of planets and stars and it is not unlikely to think that everything in growing as in the Earth Growing Theory. Matter expanding with the space between the galaxies growing farther away from each other - as the universe gets bigger are we also growing a long with it? 


BobSteneck
BobSteneck

 like pregnant she grows before she contracted in exchange of core an mantel it will press tight to rewind cell to reverse orbital spin do derive median within as well    say it as gently as i may she going to give a big one

BobSteneck
BobSteneck

@electrobleme insurrections are not different or dose it make a difference anyway for the heavens don,t exist for there where abouts or in there arena within there acknowledgement inbrene within time  @electrobleme@BobSteneck

Mack71
Mack71

Ok im no scientist by any means but i believe this is just one of the many lies-coverups that exist in our society today so many infact that you can spend years digging out the various aspects of a particular subject and start to realise that their are people out there protecting these lies and releasing various disinfo to keep people chasing their tail, so i spend so much time until i reach my own conclusions then stamp it with either believe or dont believe then stay away from the details of that particular subject and move onto the next. This one i believe it also in my opinion fits in damn well with the electric univers theory which iv`e allso stamped with a believe stamp as well as The Primer Fields video`s on youtube on the first video exspecially shows how we sit in orbit around our sun whilst being pulled into it by gravity but pushed out by electromagetism hence any pushing or pulling by us will not change the orbit of this planet, damn good videos worth a watch.

Now unfortunatly i do not have this info at hand but remeber listening to a podcast about the various saltilites that mesure in conjunction with each other the size of the planet i think they were actually weather satelites the guy was interested in weather paterns but somehow fell onto this subject and knew a scientist who maintains the software for some of the satelites and asked him if it would be possible carry out the mesurments for the size of the earth to his surprise he yes we already do but we found a descrepency with the data so we patched the software so we would not be bothered by it again!


Something is only debunked if they want it so or at least they throw alot of energy to makeing it that way.


BobSteneck
BobSteneck

SPECTRUM to in frame 

login lunar longitude   and peck inferiors of sovereign science  and it,s admit tees incan in circumference to model a 7 grain in-pick list within core as spin inpeele as lu in-plan   to set A NEW LIFE as we are witnessing to set life that it may continue to exist and complete please take good care of the new world an all life within 

lorrewilde
lorrewilde

I want to believe in this theory because it is so beautiful compared to the standard theory. But In Wikipedia it states "By examining Paleozoic material and the Earth's moment of inertia, it is suggested that the earth's radius has not changed in the last 620 million years." How do you reconcile this? Can the findings be debunked?

lorrewilde
lorrewilde

I am drawn to the expanding earth theory because it is balanced. The earth always seeks to become balanced. (And all of nature). The plate-techtonic theory is unbalanced with Pangaea sitting there like a huge blob  on the side of the earth. If you look at how the continents are arranged today, they are perfectly balanced. Is this just coincidence?

electrobleme
electrobleme

I had never thought about the continents balancing out like that, that is interesting, thanks.

Years ago I read something that said the physical location of all the continents is perfect to allow for the ocean water to circulate around the planet. This helps to give us a fantastic global and a variety of local environments for all sorts of life.

The scientist said that although it had to be fluke it was an amazing coincidence.

BobSteneck
BobSteneck

I suppose that's relevant when they teach you what you are to say and read there whats supplied to them and if they don,t agree there not paid some of us where doing and warring before you claimed global warming we where the nuts back then the 3% percent not the ones asking for there funds co2 dose not encompass the problem are earth s membrane need repaired as well look to the deep are earth is rewinding its spring you might say amen you are right 22 nautical miles north of Guam it will be as if a large meteor hit imploded  to sooner dome with north pole shifting 12 deg north a large area the size of Mongolia will rise to 400 feet up 

electrobleme
electrobleme

@Mack71Gravity is perhaps the most inconsistent constant and we do not know what actually creates it.

NASA quote:

"Question: What is gravity?

Answer: We don't really know.

We can define what it is as a field of influence, because we know how it operates in the universe. And some scientists think that it is made up of particles called gravitons which travel at the speed of light.

However, if we are to be honest, we do not know what gravity "is" in any fundamental way - we only know how it behaves. "

So physical things or events could in theory or in fact affect the earths gravity.

Changes in the earths mass or perhaps a force creating the secondary affect of gravity could very likely influence mega and micro fauna/flora in the same locations.

Perhaps also geology, physical events in our skies and also humans in our body and minds?

http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question30.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_gravity#Anomalies_and_discrepancies
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/earthandsun/earthshape.html
http://www.holoscience.com/wp/electric-gravity-in-an-electric-universe/

http://www.enhm.com.au/
http://www.ancientdestructions.com/death-extinction-megafauna-australia/

Mack71
Mack71

@electrobleme @Mack71 Hmm so the idea that our planet has always been its current size but gravity for reasons not yet known has changed?.......No sorry can`t buy that one if the size of the dinosours was the only piece of evidence pointing towards the growing earth theory then yeah but the theory does fit very nicely into other theorys although i know that in the seventies their was a change messured in our gravity as their was in the speed of light, nothing it seems is static.

 

PadmaDrago
PadmaDrago

The growing earth hypothesis ignores the fact that the Himalayas are still growing.

electrobleme
electrobleme

@PadmaDrago If the earth is growing AND shrinking and has done many times in the past, then this could perhaps explain why the Himalayas are growing.

Also may explain the many, and very puzzling, previous supercontinents?

Why and how do all the worlds’ continents roam around the surface of the earth before all meeting together again to form a supercontinent, then for some reason separate again and then create another supercontinent, and keep doing this?

Mack71
Mack71

@PadmaDrago I dont think the fact was ignored as such i think one of the sugestions for example hmm. how can i explain this, well if you make a fist with your hand and look at it side on or the knuckles may be better and slowly open your hand the smooth skin on your knuckle or back of your hand becomes wrinkled from flat to ridged (well is does on mine being a bit of an old git `n all) no mountains to mountains.

So the hard crusty continents themselves will not grow but they sit on a sphere that does and as she grows (and the sphere does`nt) the ground will flatten out beneath the continents forceing the once nice curved crusty base to flatten out and buckle and break in the process.


This to me seems an atractive notion but personally think subduction happens here and there as well as the idea above, hell thats alot of forces involved when your trying to reshape that much rock.

Suresh Bansal
Suresh Bansal

EARTH ITSELF IS A SINGLE GIANT LIVING ORGANISM AND TRUE CAUSE OF ORGANIC ORIGIN OF HYDROCARBONS.FOSSIL FUEL IS NOT AN OPTION.