Expanding Earth theory (Growing Earth theory)

Expanding Earth theory (Growing Earth theory) and an Exchanging Earth with the rest of the solar system and universe?

The Expanding Earth theory is an interesting idea especially with the stunning different visual ‘evidence’. The Earth’s continents appear to fit together on a smaller planet, to form a ‘supercontinent’ that would be the whole Earth’s surface. Also, our continents form a nearly perfect Pangea on a planet 80% its present diameter, unlike on our present size planet.

Read the latest articles investigating this interesting idea.

Pangea seperationintro thumb

Geology theory suggests that many times in the past the Earths continents have broken up, drifted, then collided back together to form a one large landmass. Each time forming or breaking up a supercontinent.

Wikipedia: In geology, a supercontinent is the assembly of most or all of the Earth’s continental blocks or cratons to form a single large landmass … Supercontinents have assembled and dispersed multiple times in the geologic past.

Supercontinent names: Ur (Vaalbara), Kenorland, Protopangea-Paleopangea, Columbia (Nuna), Rodinia, Pannotia, Pangaea.

Could the planet have expanded, shrunk, expanded, shrunk … a few times to explain multiple supercontinents?

Ocean floor rock is new, thin and different

expanding earth theory growingThe sea floor rock material is different to continental rock, it is also relatively very new and thin. Is sea floor spreading at the mid ocean ridges new material as the Earth grows or expands?

According to geology around 80% of the Earths surface is new material, being dated to younger than 200 million years.

is the earth planet still growing expanding

Oceanic crust underlies most of the two-thirds of the Earth’s surface which is covered by the oceans. It has a remarkably uniform composition (mostly 49% ± 2% SiO2) and thickness (mostly 7 ± 1 km).

The ocean floor is the most dynamic part of the Earth’s surface. As a result, no part of the oceanic crust existing today is more than 200 million years old, which is less than 5% of the age of the Earth itself.
British Antarctic Survey – Oceanic Crust

Growing Earth Theory (Expanding Earth Theory)

The Growing Earth or Expanding Earth theory suggests that instead of the supercontinents theory, the planet has expanded from its original supercontinent that was the whole Earths surface.

Over the centuries there have been a lot of theories about a hollow earth and an expanding Earth and how or what processes could cause a planet to grow. The video below is by Neal Adams who reignited the expanding Earth debate.

Neil Adams has his own unique ideas about the mechanics of how the planet could have grown. They are not necessarily what others who are interested in exploring the idea of the possibility of the planets having expanded at some time in the past.

Exchanging Earth

expanding earth energy puzzle space tornadoesBut how or what would trigger, cause, energise an Expanding Earth? What processes or mechanism could help with a Growing Earth?

Could the energy and perhaps if extra mass is needed, come from what seems to be planet Earth receiving and exchanging energy and molecules/matter with our Sun and perhaps in a circuit with our solar system?

With the other solar system bodies such as planets, moons, active asteroids and comets part of a plasma circuit and solar system engine?

Click for the Exchanging Earth introduction or for a list of all the XEarth articles (blog).

Be Sociable, Share!
44 comments
Mac Longmountain
Mac Longmountain

All that Matters is missing knowledge on this hypothesis to prove or debunk.

We can no longer imagine the earth under seveire kosmological stress. Every day scientists are flaberguested about the emerging realities in front their very own eyes. They even are very restrained when confronted with an outcome they didn't expect. Controversies have proven to be disastrous for personal career. Controversial statements logically are the target of mainstream intellect. You attack the fundaments on which their lifetime research is based.

The last 10 years of his life, Einstein was struggling. He knew he overlooked someting. Something boyond his imagination. We spent 100 years to confirm his gravitational waves. Hopefully we will not overlook what he over looked before we are confronted with it, in a dramatical way.

The theory of an expanding earth is debunked by lack of matter. Furthermore because of the movement of tectonic plates. At this moment.

Everyone who is provoking new hypothesis's in a cynical way to persist on their own realities, in fact is blocking the way of development. Although I can imagine the personal loss of s.o. who spend his life on prooving something that seems not to be realistic over night, is very hard to accept. Atmitting is a difficult emotional step for every human being. Imagine you are working yourself to peices for 40 years. All over sudden your direction of thinking, turns out to be of non issue at all! Feelings of failure will take over. Fight of flight emotions will take over. Admission won't be acceptable. A logical human reaction.

But taking Einsteins reconsiderations in mind after 10 years of struggling, and the fact he valued part of the hypothesis of Immanuel Vilokovski, more and more serious after 10 years of struggling. I suggest to reconsider reality.

Scientists as Wallace Thornhill are allready trying to pave 'this road of thinking' for a long time. Researchin his hypothesis is worth wile. It might be an eyeopener for everyone who alienates the probabity that the earth is exlanding. Btw not in a gradual way. But at a single moment in time!

Vedat Shehu
Vedat Shehu

@Mac Longmountain 


VERACITY OF THE EARTH’S GROWTH,


OF A CONTIUING PROCESS OF CORE KERNEL TRANSFORMATION


SINCE PLANET-FORMATION EPOCH


  • A Laconic Presentations -



The pivot of my theory of the Earth’s growth is a re-integration of the main facts in order to determine that the source of the energy causing the geotectonic phenomena runs inside Earth’s core since planet-formation epoch. It means that if the current function of the Earth’s core structure would not be known, even the theory of planets’ and stars’ origin would remain without real starting point and the reasoning would enter into wrong trend and reach to unreal conclusion. This theory of mine is an extension of the earlier standard framework, which has been conceived when many newer facts were not known, especially, the growth of oceanic crust, as evidence of growth of the Earth. This evidence points directly to the need to shift the standardized concept of the energy release, from the stony inert silicate shall of the core, into the energetic structure of the core, and not as only the heat’s source but also as the source of the particles and sub particles, which do newly build the atom structure of atom-molecular shape of matter as additional mass to the Earth’s growth. So, in order to argue that the Earth’s energetic source is somewhere within the core’s structure has been integrated the Earth’s inner phenomena, particularly the oceanic crust growth, with two radical problems still unsolved; firstly, what generates the Earth’s perpetual energy, when needed energy, as it is accepted by the standard, is not argued by both supposed ways of its production, on one side originally produced from gravitational collapse of the cloud’s gaseous-dusty mass through Solar System formation, and on another side produced from decay of the deficient radioactive isotopes; secondly, what triggered the calm cosmic nebula to get the swirling rotation and to become a solar system.


So, according to Einstein’s determination “energy is matter”, is argued that both shapes of the matter, in shape of the energy and in shape of the atom-molecular bonds must be produced inside the Earth’s core since the planet-formation epoch. Here, an unusual problem goes out that needs a solution: What is and how runs, within the core, the mechanism expressing the unity of both matter shapes, atom-molecular shape and the shape of the energetic fluxes known as Einstein’s “matter-energy equivalence”? Very probably, the running mechanism is composed from none of these two shapes of the matter. Let’s see.


In this theory, Einstein concept definition that “mater is energy” has meaning that matter is of particles and ultra-particles, which in our environment are manifested in atom molecular shape and energetic wave- corpuscular shape. While in cosmos is argued ultra-dense shape. Then, in the core ought to run a mechanism of a certain cosmic shape of matter, which is disintegrated in particle and sub-particle of both these shapes. It must be ultra-dense matter shape.


The concept that the Earth’s inner energy is produced from the core has met the natural resistance of the interpretations on defense of the standardized traditional theory of Earth’s origin that, Earth, after consolidation, remained in fixed size, and that the core, as an inert precipitate of the heavier components, cannot contain energy source. So, this resistance is represented by Plate Tectonics which explain the growth of ocean crust as partial phenomenon of the circulating silicate mass from upward stiffening to downward melting. Furthermore, the theory of Earth Expansion, only theory opposing the current standard theory of fixed Earth size, consequently argues that the oceanic crust growth reflects, without equivoques, Earth’s enlargement in size, but Expansion, without an acceptable causable mechanism, remains without required force to face with authority of the fixed Earth’s size reconfirmed by the standardized Plate Tectonics, and so Expansion remained as a disdained theory.


Above all, around 60 % of the crust of the terrestrial globe (i.e., oceanic crust) is newly grown among 40% fixed crust (of the continental blocks). Such ratio 3 to 2 is demonstrative fact that Earth is growing, regardless of Plate Tectonics opposite attitude done by artifices. Conclusively, based in this remarkable fact and in Expansion’s evidences, is no need to bring more details why Earth grows, but what causes the Earth’s growth. Let’s see the arguments of the existence and function of the grown mechanism within the core.


Already we consider that was argued that Earth is in growing process, and that this process cannot occurs in core’s stony shell, but inside the core, and not from a certain structural part of the core, but from ultradense ultrathin core kernel undetectable by tomography of the core, but argued through scientific reintegration of old and new data arranged in the framework of the standardized theory of planetary origin. Hence the Earth Growth is presented here in Figure.


As pointed out previously in this scientific paper, the Earth’s core makes the Earth, and, by its role, is connected directly with geological phenomena and processes, while by its origin, is linked to star-formation processes. Along integration of the Earth’s core data and related evidence from various scientific fields, is not so difficult that we could not see evaluation of the core energetic structure, and some natural connections of global tectonics theories with fundamental studies in the quantum field?¹??, in particle physics???, and in astrophysics. Very deficit in understanding common origin of solar system is separation of the energy source in stars from that of planets. Every planet or planet-like body is developed by its own source of energy similar to the nucleoosynthesis, but according to the Earth’s core structure. Consequently, it has come to view that the Earth’s core, as a demonstrative energetic cosmic object, is underestimated, and considered as a plain precipitate from the silicate mass. Then let us now restressed that core originate from core kernel transformation, and consider the matter transformation of the core kernel a cosmological problem connected with planets and stars formation.

eyebeam
eyebeam

It occurs to me that there is no current tectonic activity on Mars. Mars also currently lacks water, but we know that at some time in the past, it had water. Tectonic activity is most active in areas where the crust is exposed to water. The action of water on deep mantle rocks forms serpentine, a mineral that expands in volume. I have suspected that the mechanism of expansion may be due to seawater water seeping into fractures and reacting with the mantle, causing the formation of serpentine minerals that expand in volume. This expanding volume tends to push the fractured areas apart, allowing more seawater in, to continue the process. At certain places where a section of crust slides under another, subduction occurs, which introduces more water into the mantle, forming hot magma and mineral expansion, pushing up mountains and volcanoes.

VedShehu
VedShehu

@eyebeam 

Yours interpretation is correct only in framework of serpentinization in the Earth. Essence of tectonic activity is related to planetary object's inner energetic radiation as magnetism and electromagnetism including heat radiation. when the object radiats inimportant magnetism, as Mercury, the volcanic activity and tectonic movements are in lowest level, and when magnetic activity is not distnctable the volcanic activity and tectonic movemnts are absent as Monn and Mars are. THe internal processes of a certain cosmic objects are related to cosmic processe of matter transformation occuring in the object's core. Energetic source of the object's core originate from gigantic intragalactic explosion of supernova or hypernova type, by which is recicled matter from the stars to the gigantic ultradense massive explodaple object and vv.

This is laconic presantation of the essentials of the theory of the matter transformatio in Earth;s core kernel: Earth's core, a star-like Sun in miniature inside its shell, while the sun is a gigantic bare core.

lambertjamesd
lambertjamesd

@eyebeam The earth needs to be increasing in mass for the evidence to make sense. A smaller earth with the same mass would have a larger mass so we would expect dinosaurs to be smaller because of it. Stronger gravity limits the maximum size animals can grow to. Since the dinosaurs were much larger, that would indicate lower surface gravity meaning the earth has increased in mass.

meemoeuk
meemoeuk

@eyebeam 

>Mars also currently lacks water

It lacks surface water now and in the past. But it will have lots of subterranean water and oil.

>there is no current tectonic activity on Mars.
there is, but its much slower than Earth.Valles Marineris is a tectonic rift. 

UltraParadigm
UltraParadigm

@lambertjamesd @eyebeam Good point but you made a flaw.  The earth is 4.567 billion years old.  Dinosaurs would have been created billions of years after the earth meaning that there was plenty of time for the earth's size to be relatively the same as it is now when the dinosaurs were around.

Vedat Shehu
Vedat Shehu

@lambertjamesd @eyebeam 

The Earth is grown, and it is not argued by the gigantism of the dinosaurs. It is result of specific nucleosynthesis occurring in the Earth's core structure positioned as ultra-dense ultrathin spherical sheet above the inner solid core somewhere at bottom belt of outer melted core. This sheet is core kernel and  through its transformation is formed atom-molecular matter, that is magma, and energetic fluxes  including thermic fluxes. It is original property of all planets and planetoids, regardless of level of kernel consumption, for example in the Moon is at end of its disintegration, when in Jupiter is in its full activity, for it speaks the intensive magnetic and other radiations.

Vedat Shehu
Vedat Shehu

@lambertjamesd @eyebeam 

Furthermore, already is time that we must base in the energetic core of the Earth causing Earth Growth in order to overturn Big Bang, which pretends that has calculated that the Center-cosmic Sky, with Earth and all things inside, has been created at once some billion years ago as a gigantic burst of a singular material point without dimensions, without position in space or with space coordinates zero. Who calculated this event and how? Surely, some current super-potent astrologists under influence of theological teachings did attempt with all efforts to adapt within our advanced scientific achievements the ideology of the creation Intelligent Project. Factually Intelligent project is the Middle-Age Biblical Creation of the Geocentric Sky - calculated by clergyman that creatormakes the light, matter, space, life , lawful processes and phenomena some thousands years ago. Those astrologists are very capable in using not only mathematics and computer-modeling but also psychological state of people and their tendency to believe in the scientific fiction as to be science.

humblejewishman
humblejewishman

How would this theory work if the earth was a flat plane with the north pole in the center and Antarctica around the edge of the circle?

VedShehu
VedShehu

The Earth grows, it doesn’t expand.

Growth and expansion are two different notion. The first is result of the inner cause running inside of the thing that is growing by a certain process of matter transformation as, for example a peach fruit, a tree trunk, etc. The second is not result of certain natural process, and it seems as inflation, for example, inflation of a ball, or inflation of a state by expansion force, etc. So, the my specific theory is originally presened under title “The Growing and Developing Earth”. It is related with two problems. The first is what generates earth perpetual energy causing, between geodynamic processes, the oceanic crust growth and the continental displacement. The second is what triggered the gaseous dusty cloud to become dynamic nebula of the planetary disc of solar system. So, the procees causing the Earth’s growth runs inside its core since planet-formation epoch. See:

http://www.amazon.com/Growing-Developing-Earth-Vedat-Shehu/dp/1419616633

http://earthgrows.blogspot.com/

electrobleme
electrobleme

@VedShehu thanks for sharing the information about your Growing Earth theory book. Will you be releasing a cheaper ebook version?


It has been added to the other books, and some free PDF's, in the Expanding Earth theory book store http://www.xearththeory.com/shop/

UltraParadigm
UltraParadigm

@VedShehu Thank you for this alternate theory and all the research you have done.  This is awesome.

Mack71
Mack71

Nice explanation lambertjamesd yeah er well put ;)

lambertjamesd
lambertjamesd

Don't know for sure how the earth is expanding, but there are clues.


1. The growth is exponential (verified by geology and paleontology)

2. The increase of volume is due to an increase of mass (dinosaur size indicates this)

3. Almost all the new mass is added inside the planet (you don't have to dig that far to reach fossils millions of years old, in that same time the earth nearly doubled in radius)


The exponential growth means that the rate of expansion depends on the current size. This could mean a more massive earth attracts more matter with more gravity, a larger planet is a also a larger target collecting matter faster, or both.


Since we know the earth was less massive before we can rule out expansion by change of density and the hollow earth theory


So the expansion appears to be the result of matter being collected by earth over a large span of time. We do know earth collects space dust from the surface but it only accounts for a few small outer layers and cannot explain expansion that is coming from the core. My best guess is that neutrinos from the sun, and possibly other undiscovered particles that have mass, are passing through the earth. A portion of this mass is being captured by the earth and through some unknown process these subatomic particles are being combined into atomic particles, like what happens in a particle accelerator but only in reverse. There is more than enough mass in neutrinos alone to account for the expansion and we know they interact with matter inside the earth.

PatrickDonnelly2
PatrickDonnelly2

The Earth grew 8 times in volume, twice in radius and 4 times in surface area. The oxygen available did not grow much if at all, but as new crust was made, much outgassing occurred. Animals were used to a certain pressure of oxygen. That was much reduced after expansion. Bigger animals died off.

PatrickDonnelly2
PatrickDonnelly2

Dr Don Scott said it all a while ago. Halton Arp discovered red shift won a Nobel, but was ignored when he said that matter fills in....

Sirius is a hot blue, older star. Possibly, Sol came from there? And Sol may be in orbit around Sirius A.

ROYGBIV. Next stage is Green Sun. Possibly the system gains more planets.... The star heats up and we may move further away. Hopefully, Venus and all new planets stay away from the Earth.




PatrickDonnelly2
PatrickDonnelly2

A Z pinch exists within every star. When we say that Electricity is always accompanied by Magnetism, we are not completely correct. EMF!

E and M and Force!

When the earth left the red giant star that we now call Sol, it was because the boundary of the EMF had been moved inwards. The Earth at least, was kicked out. Once it was no longer subject to the Z Pinch, it grew in volume 8 times, in surface area 4 times and 2 times in radius. New crust was formed from the magma welling up from below. The old crust was split and spread across the larger globe.

When Venus left the Orange stage of Sol, we had a yellow sun.

The next stage is a Green star. How many planets will be hurled into the current system?

IndianOutlaw
IndianOutlaw

Every year the earth is bombarded with tons of pounds of mass in the form of meteors this adds mass. its like when you keep eating Doritos while you tell everyone they are wrong on the internet. you are expanding. wow. Its actually logical when you think of it.

electrobleme
electrobleme

meteors are a good mechanism for any planet to gain mass and get thicker.

no theory is right or wrong, personally i would say its fun (essential?) to at least test any theory or religion with thought experiments. could the planet itself (mantles, surfaces) be expanding or growing bigger internally?

theoretically what else could mid ocean ridges that produce sea floor spreading and new rock mean? what other mechanism could make some large land areas rise rapidly?

i think i have read that the planet earth has a molten metal core because it was an isolated body in space and had to produce its own magnetic field. as flux transfer events, spacequakes and other space plasma things seem to show the planet is not isolated but has current flowing through it in a solar circuit. what could that imply?

not just for the origin of the earths magnetosphere but for planet formation and everything based on it?

Snakelady
Snakelady

ofcourse it's growing the Jurassic period is miles beneath us.

terry
terry

If the universe has alway's existed, wouldn't it be one vast perpetual motion machine? Not a very credible position Mack71

Mack71
Mack71

@terry and yet its here always has been always will be it does not need your permission to exist it just does it is god and to try and understand god well no buddha no bible can do this it cant be done we can gain greater understanding but no where near total understanding.

As far as time is concerned weve all been here for a blink of an eye and trying to prove wheter the universe is timeless or not, haha well the lofty ideas of man.


as for credible position yes it was and is credible thats why i decided to accepted it and then i move on i do not require it to be credible to any judge or courts lol this was my sentient choice as you and others are i hope free to have your choice.

And somewhere along the line its perpetual motion what ever system, it once boomed into existance to where we are now going faster (so they say redshift or something) out n out i guess untill it dissipates into nothing if indeed its going faster, so iguess it goes boom again unless were led to believe that this is the only universe ever (oops "ever" that perpetual motion thing again) so time what is time did it start? does it exist sure we gave it seconds hours days, labels as such but actual time did we invent it just to try and understand the movement of things and life and death?


Is time? or is there no past no future the Universe is NOW and just is....

Mack71
Mack71

Expanding Universe! expanding into what exactly? sorry dont buy it. Universe is the universe always there everywhere always has been always will be, well thats one of my conclusions i decided to cement in place anyway until i find evedence to the contrary any how.

rodneykawecki
rodneykawecki

iUniverse Growing Earth Theory (Expanding Earth Theory)


The Growing Earth or Expanding Earth theory suggests that instead of the supercontinents theory, the planet has expanded from its original supercontinent that was the whole Earths surface.


Changes in gravity without change in Earths mass (gravity as an electromagnetic force, as science does not know what gravity actually is, they just know what they call gravity does)


It is my great question that ask " If the iuniverse is expanding " does this mean that all matter and celestial spheres galactic alike physically getting bigger and bigger without possibility of notice"? In the bible god talks about the giant = are we growing like giants a long with the planets and stars in the universe as the iuniverse expands? 


We look at the universe as a Hawkings bubble but Hubble Expanding we observe ourselves on a planets in a galaxy full of planets and stars and it is not unlikely to think that everything in growing as in the Earth Growing Theory. Matter expanding with the space between the galaxies growing farther away from each other - as the universe gets bigger are we also growing a long with it? 


BobSteneck
BobSteneck

 like pregnant she grows before she contracted in exchange of core an mantel it will press tight to rewind cell to reverse orbital spin do derive median within as well    say it as gently as i may she going to give a big one

BobSteneck
BobSteneck

@electrobleme insurrections are not different or dose it make a difference anyway for the heavens don,t exist for there where abouts or in there arena within there acknowledgement inbrene within time  @electrobleme@BobSteneck

Mack71
Mack71

Ok im no scientist by any means but i believe this is just one of the many lies-coverups that exist in our society today so many infact that you can spend years digging out the various aspects of a particular subject and start to realise that their are people out there protecting these lies and releasing various disinfo to keep people chasing their tail, so i spend so much time until i reach my own conclusions then stamp it with either believe or dont believe then stay away from the details of that particular subject and move onto the next. This one i believe it also in my opinion fits in damn well with the electric univers theory which iv`e allso stamped with a believe stamp as well as The Primer Fields video`s on youtube on the first video exspecially shows how we sit in orbit around our sun whilst being pulled into it by gravity but pushed out by electromagetism hence any pushing or pulling by us will not change the orbit of this planet, damn good videos worth a watch.

Now unfortunatly i do not have this info at hand but remeber listening to a podcast about the various saltilites that mesure in conjunction with each other the size of the planet i think they were actually weather satelites the guy was interested in weather paterns but somehow fell onto this subject and knew a scientist who maintains the software for some of the satelites and asked him if it would be possible carry out the mesurments for the size of the earth to his surprise he yes we already do but we found a descrepency with the data so we patched the software so we would not be bothered by it again!


Something is only debunked if they want it so or at least they throw alot of energy to makeing it that way.


BobSteneck
BobSteneck

SPECTRUM to in frame 

login lunar longitude   and peck inferiors of sovereign science  and it,s admit tees incan in circumference to model a 7 grain in-pick list within core as spin inpeele as lu in-plan   to set A NEW LIFE as we are witnessing to set life that it may continue to exist and complete please take good care of the new world an all life within 

lorrewilde
lorrewilde

I want to believe in this theory because it is so beautiful compared to the standard theory. But In Wikipedia it states "By examining Paleozoic material and the Earth's moment of inertia, it is suggested that the earth's radius has not changed in the last 620 million years." How do you reconcile this? Can the findings be debunked?

lorrewilde
lorrewilde

I am drawn to the expanding earth theory because it is balanced. The earth always seeks to become balanced. (And all of nature). The plate-techtonic theory is unbalanced with Pangaea sitting there like a huge blob  on the side of the earth. If you look at how the continents are arranged today, they are perfectly balanced. Is this just coincidence?

electrobleme
electrobleme

I had never thought about the continents balancing out like that, that is interesting, thanks.

Years ago I read something that said the physical location of all the continents is perfect to allow for the ocean water to circulate around the planet. This helps to give us a fantastic global and a variety of local environments for all sorts of life.

The scientist said that although it had to be fluke it was an amazing coincidence.

BobSteneck
BobSteneck

I suppose that's relevant when they teach you what you are to say and read there whats supplied to them and if they don,t agree there not paid some of us where doing and warring before you claimed global warming we where the nuts back then the 3% percent not the ones asking for there funds co2 dose not encompass the problem are earth s membrane need repaired as well look to the deep are earth is rewinding its spring you might say amen you are right 22 nautical miles north of Guam it will be as if a large meteor hit imploded  to sooner dome with north pole shifting 12 deg north a large area the size of Mongolia will rise to 400 feet up 

electrobleme
electrobleme

@Mack71Gravity is perhaps the most inconsistent constant and we do not know what actually creates it.

NASA quote:

"Question: What is gravity?

Answer: We don't really know.

We can define what it is as a field of influence, because we know how it operates in the universe. And some scientists think that it is made up of particles called gravitons which travel at the speed of light.

However, if we are to be honest, we do not know what gravity "is" in any fundamental way - we only know how it behaves. "

So physical things or events could in theory or in fact affect the earths gravity.

Changes in the earths mass or perhaps a force creating the secondary affect of gravity could very likely influence mega and micro fauna/flora in the same locations.

Perhaps also geology, physical events in our skies and also humans in our body and minds?

http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question30.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_gravity#Anomalies_and_discrepancies
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/earthandsun/earthshape.html
http://www.holoscience.com/wp/electric-gravity-in-an-electric-universe/

http://www.enhm.com.au/
http://www.ancientdestructions.com/death-extinction-megafauna-australia/

Mack71
Mack71

@electrobleme @Mack71 Hmm so the idea that our planet has always been its current size but gravity for reasons not yet known has changed?.......No sorry can`t buy that one if the size of the dinosours was the only piece of evidence pointing towards the growing earth theory then yeah but the theory does fit very nicely into other theorys although i know that in the seventies their was a change messured in our gravity as their was in the speed of light, nothing it seems is static.

 

PadmaDrago
PadmaDrago

The growing earth hypothesis ignores the fact that the Himalayas are still growing.

electrobleme
electrobleme

@PadmaDrago If the earth is growing AND shrinking and has done many times in the past, then this could perhaps explain why the Himalayas are growing.

Also may explain the many, and very puzzling, previous supercontinents?

Why and how do all the worlds’ continents roam around the surface of the earth before all meeting together again to form a supercontinent, then for some reason separate again and then create another supercontinent, and keep doing this?

Mack71
Mack71

@PadmaDrago I dont think the fact was ignored as such i think one of the sugestions for example hmm. how can i explain this, well if you make a fist with your hand and look at it side on or the knuckles may be better and slowly open your hand the smooth skin on your knuckle or back of your hand becomes wrinkled from flat to ridged (well is does on mine being a bit of an old git `n all) no mountains to mountains.

So the hard crusty continents themselves will not grow but they sit on a sphere that does and as she grows (and the sphere does`nt) the ground will flatten out beneath the continents forceing the once nice curved crusty base to flatten out and buckle and break in the process.


This to me seems an atractive notion but personally think subduction happens here and there as well as the idea above, hell thats alot of forces involved when your trying to reshape that much rock.

Suresh Bansal
Suresh Bansal

EARTH ITSELF IS A SINGLE GIANT LIVING ORGANISM AND TRUE CAUSE OF ORGANIC ORIGIN OF HYDROCARBONS.FOSSIL FUEL IS NOT AN OPTION.